Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.īerners-Lee, T. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 233–247. Ethics of internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Manual or electronic? The changing role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Choosing qualitative data analysis software: Atlas/ti and NUD*IST compared. Standards for reporting on humanities-oriented research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33–40.Īmerican Educational Research Association. Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. KeywordsĪmerican Educational Research Association. Finally, we address potential directions as these programs are being influenced by Web 2.0 developments. We then summarize the “user experience” literature and subsequently discuss the boundaries between cadres of qualitative researchers who do use software, and those who do not.
We briefly review the historical development of QDA software-including associated methodological questions and issues-before identifying the increasingly diverse array of expected features and functions in most of the current software programs. One genre of software, known as Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS or QDA software), is specifically designed to support qualitative research, as opposed to tools primarily used for the collection of data (such as audio or video recorders), or presentation of findings (such as presentation or modeling software).
The most common question from novices regarding the use of software in qualitative research is “which program should I use?” when they would be better served by asking “what analytical tasks will I be engaged in, and what are the different ways I can leverage technology to do them well?” In this chapter, we first provide an overview of tasks involved in analyzing qualitative data, with a focus on increasingly complex projects, before we turn to the software meant to support these tasks.
0 kommentar(er)
